**By branding consumer preference for normal goods as “commodity fetishism,” the English Royalists permitted only the production and consumption of necessities and inferior goods. Their industrial and commercial policy of mass‑producing inferior goods (cheap copies) for export was hardly different from Marxist communism.**
**The only difference was that Marxist communism, in Fukuzawa Yukichi’s words, overestimated the ignorant and unenlightened propertyless class—‘the servant boy’—as the central actor (‘sovereign’) of society, whereas the English Royalists, who sought to restore absolute monarchy, insisted that sovereignty resided solely in the king.**
**This industrial and commercial strategy—exploiting the ruled at subsistence wages to mass‑produce inferior goods (cheap copies) for export—is similar to the national strategy of today’s Chinese Communist Party.**
**An economy that relies on exploiting the ruled at subsistence wages to mass‑produce agricultural products or inferior goods (cheap copies) instead of generating new normal goods through innovation inevitably declines. Once it can no longer expand its overseas markets, it triggers micro‑level price destruction, macro‑level deflation, and recession, ultimately leading to economic self‑destruction like the former Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc.**
**The U.S. Democratic Party’s economic model—treating the mass production of cotton by exploiting Black slaves at subsistence cost on Southern English Royalists.**
1
0
**By branding consumer preference for normal goods as “commodity fetishism,” the English Royalists permitted only the production and consumption of necessities and inferior goods. Their industrial and commercial policy of mass‑producing inferior goods (cheap copies) for export was hardly different from Marxist communism.**
**The only difference was that Marxist communism, in Fukuzawa Yukichi’s words, overestimated the ignorant and unenlightened propertyless class—‘the servant boy’—as the central actor (‘sovereign’) of society, whereas the English Royalists, who sought to restore absolute monarchy, insisted that sovereignty resided solely in the king.**
**This industrial and commercial strategy—exploiting the ruled at subsistence wages to mass‑produce inferior goods (cheap copies) for export—is similar to the national strategy of today’s Chinese Communist Party.**
**An economy that relies on exploiting the ruled at subsistence wages to mass‑produce agricultural products or inferior goods (cheap copies) instead of generating new normal goods through innovation inevitably declines. Once it can no longer expand its overseas markets, it triggers micro‑level price destruction, macro‑level deflation, and recession, ultimately leading to economic self‑destruction like the former Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc.**
**The U.S. Democratic Party’s economic model—treating the mass production of cotton by exploiting Black slaves at subsistence cost on Southern English Royalists.**
https://gyazo.com/2edbec2903151e001819ddd21641b862