＞Trump Accelerates "Presidential Businesses" Including Crypto and Bibles; Opposition Criticizes—US Midterm Elections ＞(Jiji Press, Saturday, Aug 8, 2026, 7:05 AM Dist.)
＞[Comment 1]
＞Considering the huge responsibility of leading the American public—who have borne the heavy burden of acting as the "world's police" at immense self-sacrifice up to this day—this income is by no means excessive for the remuneration received by a U.S. President.
＞Some claim that "accumulating crypto assets constitutes a conflict of interest because it contradicts the role of regulating money laundering." However, if we follow that logic, cash—which, unlike bank deposits, leaves no paper trail—is also a payment method used for money laundering. This would mean that government officials receiving their salaries in cash is likewise a conflict of interest that promotes money laundering—in other words, an act contrary to public order and morals.
1
0
＞トランプ氏、「大統領ビジネス」加速 暗号資産や聖書、野党は批判 米中間選挙
2026/8/8(土) 7:05配信 時事通信
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/5fe82ce4fc9a07ff742ed67255b3e6ded683530b
.
.
.
〓多大なる犠牲的精神を発揮して今日まで『世界の警察官』という重荷を背負い続けて来たアメリカ国民を統率する重責を担うアメリカ大統領の受け取る報酬として見れば､決して多過ぎる年収ではない｡
https://gyazo.com/59acdba8ed635add5a31da49451fddd7
〓「マネー·ロンダリングに悪用されるのを規制する立場と相反するから暗号資産の積み増しは利益相反だ」という人が居るが､それを言い出したら銀行預金と異なり足が付かない現金(キャッシュ)もマネー·ロンダリングに使われる決済手段であるから､政府関係者が給与を現金(キャッシュ)で授受することもマネー·ロンダリングを助長する利益相反､すなわち公序良俗に反する行為だということになる｡
〓そもそも現金(キャッシュ)や銀行預金などマネー·ストックを調節する金融政策を任された中央銀行が重大な過ちを冒す事態に対処することが、金融政策当局の管理の外側で流通する暗号資産(仮想通貨)のレゾン·デトルであった。
〓従って､暗号資産を上場したり､中央銀行の公開市場操作対象に位置づけるなど､金融政策当局の管理下に編入することこそ暗号資産(仮想通貨)のレゾン·デトルを抹殺する利益相反､すなわち公序良俗に反する行為なのである｡
〓アメリカ大統領が､金融政策当局の管理下に置かれる銀行預金や有価証券､現金(キャッシュ)のみしか保有しないことは､寧ろFRBによる金融政策の重大な過ちを正す立場にあるアメリカ大統領が絶対に冒してはいならない利益相反行為である｡
https://gyazo.com/b23cdea504b720f10d8c213f85945216
ーーーーー
＞[Article Headline]
＞Trump Accelerates "Presidential Businesses" Including Crypto and Bibles; Opposition Criticizes—US Midterm Elections
＞(Jiji Press, Saturday, Aug 8, 2026, 7:05 AM Dist.)
＞[Comment 1]
＞Considering the huge responsibility of leading the American public—who have borne the heavy burden of acting as the "world's police" at immense self-sacrifice up to this day—this income is by no means excessive for the remuneration received by a U.S. President.
https://gyazo.com/660606e2ea22865dc1047eeadb8be017
＞[Comment 2]
＞Some claim that "accumulating crypto assets constitutes a conflict of interest because it contradicts the role of regulating money laundering." However, if we follow that logic, cash—which, unlike bank deposits, leaves no paper trail—is also a payment method used for money laundering. This would mean that government officials receiving their salaries in cash is likewise a conflict of interest that promotes money laundering—in other words, an act contrary to public order and morals.