【You】
怨嗟原因や強盗目的の国内刑法上の個別·具体的な殺人事件における教唆犯と､マルクス共産主義テロ組織による組織的な粛清(大量虐殺)を混同すべきではない｡

マルクス共産主義テロリストによる粛清(大量虐殺)は､ナチス·ドイツによるホロコーストと同様､国際法上の人道に対する罪を構成するからだ｡

他者にマルクス共産主義を植え付け､組織的なテロ行為(暴力革命)の正当性､歴史的必然性を繰り返し刷り込んだ者は､個別·具体的な相当因果関係が証明されなくても､マルクス共産主義団体(例えば共産主義マルクス経済学を所属する学生に組織的に刷り込む経済学部)内部での上下関係(単位·学位授与権を持つ教官と学生)さえ証明されれば､国際法上の人道に対する罪で国際法の裁きを下すことが可能となる｡

『プロレタリア暴力革命は資本主義の必然的帰結だ』と妄信するアメリカのマルクス共産主義者が､今日まで正々堂々と『マルクス共産主義者』を名乗らずに『民主社会主義者』だとか『民主党員』だとかいう隠語を用いて世間の目を欺こうとして来たのは､“反革ブルジョア分子”に対する組織的な粛清(大量虐殺)を繰り返して来たプロレタリア暴力革命の正当性を喧伝する行為が国際法上の人道に対する罪に該当するため､訴追の対象となるという後ろめたさの裏返しであろう｡

https://gyazo.com/65f696ce135e8b1ff17b9b1ebebf8139

プロレタリア暴力革命を正当化するマルクス共産主義に著しく傾いた大内兵衛が総長を務めたような大学で､「資本主義者､すなわち反革ブルジョア分子がプロレタリア暴力革命によって粛清される運命を辿ることに歴史的必然性が認められる」と繰り返し学生に刷り込めば､例え個別·具体的なユダヤ人殺傷方法を教唆しなかったとしてもナチス·ドイツの指導層と同じように､人道に対する罪で裁かれる筋合いである。

＞[You]
Although it is claimed that the administrations of Kanto Gakuin University and Doshisha University—as well as Congregationalist Protestants and Baptist churches (Protestants)—never officially endorsed the activities of the Red Army Faction (Sekigun-ha), the fact remains that by providing them with a space for their operations, these university administrations, along with the Congregationalist Protestants and Baptist churches, enabled the Red Army Faction to survive.

As a result, the group was able to successfully carry out the Yodo-go Hijacking Incident (1970) and the Tel Aviv Lod Airport Massacre (1972).

Simply claiming that they never officially endorsed the Red Army Faction's activities does not absolve the administrations of Kanto Gakuin University and Doshisha University, nor the Congregationalist Protestants and Baptist churches who actually provided the venue for their operations, from moral and historical responsibility regarding these acts of terrorism.

[You]
It is a known fact that at Doshisha University, associated with Congregationalist Protestantism, and Kanto Gakuin University, associated with the Baptist Church, Marxist economics—rather than modern economics—was taught in the vast majority of lectures within their faculties of economics.

When faculty members teach Marx's Capital and The Communist Manifesto, which advocate that "proletarian violent revolution is an inevitable outcome of capitalism," to impressionable students, it should have been foreseeable to a certain extent that some of those students would resort to acts of violence, such as the Red Army Faction's hijacking incident and the Lod Airport massacre, as part of a proletarian violent revolution.

Hyoe Ouchi, a leading postwar Marxist economist, personally visited the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China—nations established through proletarian violent revolutions such as the Russian Revolution and the Chinese Civil War.

Following his tour in 1956, he remarked regarding socialism:

"I have studied socialism for a full forty years, but my progress was slow, and until now I could not clearly tell whether socialism was a utopia or a science. However, after coming here and observing various things, I have firmly come to realize that it is indeed a science." [21]

Furthermore, regarding the field of economics, he highly evaluated the Soviet planned economy and praised both Lenin and Stalin as economists, stating:

"In the second half of the 20th century, Russian economics will come to demand a fairly prominent position in the global economic community as a discipline with progressive characteristics...

The names that will gain ever greater brilliance as economists amid such historical transformations will undoubtedly be Lenin and Stalin." [21] (Wikipedia)

If students who were taught Marx's The Communist Manifesto and Capital—which preach that "proletarian violent revolution is an inevitable outcome of capitalism"—went on to commit hijacking incidents and indiscriminate acts of terrorism as part of a proletarian violent revolution, even if they were only a tiny minority rather than the entire student body, it is only natural that the teachers in question (Communist Marxist economists) should be held liable as instigators (abettors) of murder.

[You]
One must not confuse the instigation of individual, concrete murder cases under domestic criminal law—motivated by personal resentment or robbery—with the systematic purges (massacres) carried out by Marxist-Communist terrorist organizations.

This is because purges (massacres) conducted by Marxist-Communist terrorists constitute crimes against humanity under international law, akin to the Holocaust committed by Nazi Germany.

Those who command organizational acts of terrorism based on Marxist-Communism can be brought to justice under international law as suspects of crimes against humanity—even without proving a concrete, individual causal relationship—so long as the hierarchical chain of command within the Marxist-Communist organization is established.

The reason why American Marxist-Communists—who fanatically believe that "proletarian violent revolution is an inevitable outcome of capitalism"—have to this day avoided openly identifying themselves as "Marxist-Communists," opting instead to deceive the public using euphemisms such as "democratic socialists" or "Democrats," is likely out of fear of being prosecuted for crimes against humanity under international law for repeatedly instigating systematic purges (massacres) by Marxist-Communist terrorist organizations against "counter-revolutionary bourgeois elements."

If a university—such as one presided over by a president like Hyoe Ouchi, who leaned overwhelmingly toward Marxist-Communism—repeatedly indoctrinates students with the view that capitalists, or counter-revolutionary bourgeois elements, are historically destined to be purged through proletarian violent revolution, its leadership stands to be judged for crimes against humanity in the same manner as the leadership of Nazi Germany, even if they did not teach specific methods for killing Jewish people.