『板垣征四郎や石原莞爾ら東北の蝦夷(えみし)が独断で強行した満洲事変の尻拭いを明治維新と戊辰戦争を経て大和民族が樹立した日本政府に押し付けた東北の蝦夷(えみし)·安達峰一郎』



【You】
満洲事変当時の関東軍の主力は仙台から移駐した部隊だったか？

＞《Google SI Overview》
＞その通りです。1931年（昭和6年）9月に満洲事変が勃発した当時、現地の関東軍で実際に主力の戦闘部隊として軍事行動を行ったのは、仙台に本拠地（師団司令部）を置く「陸軍第二師団」でした。

＞当時の状況の要点は以下の通りです。

＞交代での満洲駐留：当時の関東軍は常設の独立した大軍隊ではなく、日本国内の「師団」が数年交代で満洲（現在の中国東北部）に派遣（移駐）され、守備にあたる形式をとっていました。

＞第二師団（仙台）の駐屯：事変が起きた1931年当時、たまたま関東軍の指揮下に入り、南満洲鉄道（満鉄）沿線などの警備についていたのが、仙台の第二師団でした。

＞柳条湖事件と出動：事変の引き金となった柳条湖事件が起きると、関東軍参謀(石原莞爾中佐ら)の計画·命令により、長春や奉天（現在の瀋陽）などに配置されていた第二師団の各連隊（歩兵第4連隊、第29連隊など）が即座に出動し、またたく間に満洲全土の占領へと動きました。

＞したがって、「満洲事変当時の関東軍の主力は仙台から移駐した部隊だった」という認識は史実として正確です。

【You】
常設国際司法裁判所長·安達峰一郎(山形県出身·ポンコツ東大法学部卒)が満洲事変を受け総理大臣に送った書簡の内容は？

＞《Google SI Overview》
＞常設国際司法裁判所（PCIJ）所長であった安達峰一郎が満洲事変（1931年）を受けて日本の総理大臣（宛先は当時の斎藤実首相など）に送った書簡では、満洲における日本の権益保持の必要性を認めつつも、事変が国際司法の場に持ち込まれれば日本が極めて不利になると危惧し、法廷闘争ではなく政治·外交交渉による解決を強く訴えました。 [1]

＞書簡の主な内容と背景

＞法的解決の回避の訴え: 満洲事変に関する紛争が常設国際司法裁判所の判決に付された場合、当時の国際社会の動向から見て「徒（いたず）らに各員の一笑を買うに過ぎざること明白」であり、日本にとって決定的に不利になると指摘しました。 [1]

＞政治·外交による解決: 裁判という法による裁きに委ねるのではなく、「政治問題として大きく広く」捉え、政府が外交的·政治的手段によって事態を収拾するよう促しました。 [1]

＞国益と国際協調の板挟み: 外交官·国際法学者として日本の満洲権益を守るべきだという立場を持ちながらも、国際社会の法秩序と母国の軍事的暴走の間で深い苦悩と憂慮を抱えていたことが、残された一次史料や書簡群から明らかになっています。 [1, 2, 3]

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3i2spgclh0o791gsv585n/spanhovep-costa-rica-1041852_640.jpg?rlkey=tc6ysdxiog3st32ciad169cxw&st=819qp97m&dl=0

【You】
常設国際司法裁判所における安達峰一郎のキャリア如何？

＞《Google SI Overview》
＞ 常設国際司法裁判所（PCIJ）の所長には日本の安達峰一郎が1931年にアジア人として初めて選出された。

＞常設国際司法裁判所（PCIJ）とは

＞概要：国際連盟に置かれた国際司法機関であり、現在の国際司法裁判所（ICJ）の前身。

＞設置期間：1922年から1946年まで存在した。

＞安達峰一郎（あだち·みねいちろう）について

＞経歴：外交官や国際法学者として活躍し、常設国際司法裁判所の裁判官を務めた。

＞所長就任：1931年に最高点で第2期目の裁判官に当選し、同年1931年に所長に選出された（任期は1931〜1934年）。

＞そのほか：満州事変勃発の翌年1932年に裁判所長を退任し、1934年に亡くなった。



〓山形県出身·ポンコツ東大法学部卒だった安達峰一郎｡

〓常設国際司法裁判所（PCIJ）所長であった安達峰一郎は満洲事変（1931年）を受けて日本の総理大臣（宛先は当時の斎藤実首相など）に書簡を送った｡

〓その書簡の中で安達峰一郎は､満洲における『日本』の権益保持の必要性を認めつつも､事変が国際司法の場に持ち込まれれば『日本』が極めて不利になると危惧し､法廷闘争ではなく政治·外交交渉による解決を強く訴えた｡

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/zibpur5irpvecsi61s4tf/pexels-zhine-pics-475050645-17906522.jpg?rlkey=hyojzwsb5j1iwn53pvokhs2ny&st=psarazjd&dl=0

〓国際紛争解決手段としての締約国相互での戦争を放棄し平和的に解決することを規定したケロッグ·ブリアン協定(パリ不戦条約Treaty for the Renunciation of War､1929年発効)｡

〓国際法(=ケロッグ·ブリアン協定)に従えば､柳条湖事件(1931年9月18日<金>)は日本政府と中華民国政府の間で平和的に解決されなければならなかった｡

〓それと同時に日本政府は､国際法(=ケロッグ·ブリアン協定)を無視して独断で軍事行動に突き進んだ東北の蝦夷(えみし)を主力とする関東軍の幹部､すなわち板垣征四郎や石原莞爾ら東北の蝦夷(えみし)を厳罰に処す必要があった｡

〓ところがポンコツ東大法学部卒の東北の蝦夷(えみし)であった常設国際司法裁判所長·安達峰一郎は､国際法(=ケロッグ·ブリアン協定)を無視して独断で軍事行動に突き進んだ東北の蝦夷(えみし)を主力とする関東軍の幹部､すなわち板垣征四郎や石原莞爾らの処罰を進言するどころか､①満洲における『日本』の権益保持は必要､②事変が国際司法の場に持ち込まれれば『日本』が極めて不利になると訴え､常設国際司法裁判所での法廷闘争に持ち込まれる前に､日本政府と中華民国政府の間で政治·外交交渉による解決を行うよう､進言した｡

〓要するに､東北の蝦夷(えみし)が独断で引き起こした国際法違反の軍事行動の責任を(明治維新と戊辰戦争を経て大和民族が樹立した)日本政府になすりつけて頬被むりを極め込んだのであった｡

〓それは常設国際司法裁判所長として実に不適格な有るまじき行為であり､そこにはポンコツ東大法学部卒業生による国賊としての振る舞いが如実に表れていた｡

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/c63bccag4qke5eit3vm47/pexels-jimmyflowers10-36448235.jpg?rlkey=pv0yl7gzdmovyen0cj11hv3bc&st=yo06l1ij&dl=0

＞アメリカ国際法協会名誉会員（1931年）

＞アメリカ芸術科学アカデミー名誉会員（1932年）

＞オランダ科学協会会員（1933年）

＞旭日菊花大綬章(1934年)

＞オランダ国葬ならびに常設国際司法裁判所葬(1934年)



〓ところが､“ポンコツ東大法学部卒”とか“常設国際司法裁判所長”という肩書きを過信した(大和民族の樹立による)日本政府ばかりか､アメリカやオランダを始めとする西洋列強の指導者達が挙って東北のクズ蝦夷(えみし)に過ぎない安達峰一郎を褒めちぎったのである｡

〓三一権実諍論(西暦817年〜西暦821年)以来1,200年の日本の歴史を振り返ると､東北の蝦夷(えみし)供は：

①実態は“ゴミ·クズ”であるポンコツ東大法学部卒の肩書きを手に入れ､更には南満州鉄道守備隊(=関東軍)司令官の椅子を手に入れ､常設国際司法裁判所長の椅子を手に入れ､国際連盟事務次長の椅子を手に入れて､“肩書き”を過信する大和民族や西洋列強を集団催眠にかけ､まず調略すること､

②前九年の役(西暦1050年〜1062年)や後三年の役(西暦1083年〜西暦1087年)､戊辰戦争(1868年〜1869年)､真珠湾奇襲攻撃(1941年)などに見られるように､蝦夷(えみし)供が暴発したくなった時点で､勝算が全く無くても暴発すること､

③一の谷の鵯越(西暦1184年3月)や柳条湖事件､真珠湾奇襲攻撃に見られるように､敵方の戦争準備が整う前に奇襲攻撃(Surprise attack)を仕掛けること､

を常套戦術とする｡

＞《Google SI Overview》
＞米カリフォルニア州サンディエゴ海軍基地で行われたトマホーク巡航ミサイル搭載のための改修工事は、海上自衛隊のイージス護衛艦「ちょうかい」を対象に実施され、2026年3月に改修が完了した。

＞これにより、海上自衛隊の艦艇として初めてトマホークの発射能力（反撃能力）を獲得した。

＞改修工事と運用の概要は以下の通りです。

＞⚓️ 改修の経緯とタイム·ライン

＞• 2025年10月：定期整備のタイミングに合わせ、サンディエゴ海軍基地へ派遣。米海軍の支援のもとで、艦内システムの改修工事および乗員の運用訓練が開始された。

＞• 2026年3月26日(木)：サンディエゴにて改修終了を記念する式典が挙行され、正式にトマホーク発射能力の獲得が宣言されました。

＞• 2026年夏（8月まで）：サンディエゴ沖の太平洋上で、実弾を使用した初のトマホーク試射（発射実験）が実施され、見事成功を収めた。

＞• 2026年9月：すべての訓練と実射試験を終え、「ちょうかい」は日本へ帰国し、実際の任務（定係港：佐世保）に就く見通しとなっている。

＞🚀 改修の内容と今後の計画

＞今回の改修では、高度な火力管制システム（ミサイル射撃統制システム）の統合や、艦へのハードウェア·ソフトウェアの追加が行われました。

＞日本政府は2027年度までに米国から最大400発のトマホークを取得する計画を進めている。

＞防衛省は「ちょうかい」を皮切りに、保有する全8隻のイージス艦（こんごう型、あたご型、まや型）に対して順次同様の改修を進める方針である。

〓田母神俊雄(空幕長)や南雲憲一郎(初代統合作戦司令官)など､軍国主義に凝り固まって いつ暴発するか分からない根っからの無法者である東北の蝦夷(えみし)が牛耳る現在の日本の自衛隊｡

〓そんな連中に気前良くトマホークを400発も売り渡して大丈夫なのか｡

〓三一権実諍論(西暦817年〜西暦821年)以来1,200年の日本の歴史に照らせば､その内､東北の蝦夷(えみし)が暴発して三沢や横須賀､岩国､佐世保､嘉手納などの米軍基地にトマホークを撃ち込んで来る事態は容易に想像がつこうというものである｡

〓或いは台湾有事などが勃発した際に､有志国が連合軍を組成したことなどを切っ掛けに､米軍の制止を無視して東北の蝦夷(えみし)が牛耳る日本の自衛隊が単独軍事行動に突入することも大いに有り得ることだ｡

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/5g1ywzaqnhibh6bu3hhbe/memorycatcher-alley-6788897_640.jpg?rlkey=xqo3t1lxdmht2fwkzjx9hnyid&st=zaz2sj7o&dl=0

〓一方､東北の蝦夷(えみし)供に警告して置く：

①貴様ら､東北の蝦夷(えみし)である新渡戸稲造が国際連盟事務次長となり戦後も五千円札の肖像画となったり､またポンコツ東大法学部卒のクズ常設国際司法裁判所長であった安達峰一郎を(大和民族が運営する)日本政府ばかりか､アメリカやオランダなど西洋列強が挙って称賛し､国葬まで催すのを見て､大和民族や西洋列強を騙すのはチョロいもんだと慢心し､それなら狂人ヒットラーと手を組んで一気に日·米·仏のブルジョア革命政権を倒し､日本およびアジアに東北の蝦夷(えみし)が牛耳る軍国主義(ファシスト)政権を樹立しようと野心を暴発させた｡

②しかし､“肩書き”などに簡単に騙されるミーハーな大和民族や西洋列強のブルジョア革命政権ではあるが､ひとたび東北の蝦夷(えみし)や狂人ヒットラーに騙されたことに気づいた後は､一致団結して猛反撃に出るので､東北の蝦夷(えみし)や狂人ヒットラーのナチ党など赤子の手を捻るように叩き潰されてしまうということだ｡

〓よく覚えて置け！

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d75suniu2m7ggj0nv1efx/1107707.jpg?rlkey=93pfdhqxwyj0kfr2cxjts51hk&st=kf8hk7ko&dl=0

東北の蝦夷(えみし)が日本に持ち込んだ軍国主義(ファシズム)

English Translation

"Criticism of Bushido (1899), fabricated by Inazo Nitobe, an Emishi of Tohoku"



※※※ Bushido (Inazo Nitobe) - Wikipedia

> Bushido: The Soul of Japan was severely criticized for its content by figures such as Tetsujiro Inoue, who denounced Christians for disrespecting the Meiji Emperor [10], and Basil Hall Chamberlain, the British, Professor Emeritus at the mediocre University of Tokyo who translated Kimigayo and Kojiki into English [11].

> Shortly after the Japanese edition of the book was published, Sokichi Tsuda [12]—a Waseda University professor whose core argument was that "the imperial system should evolve into a constitutional monarchy"—pointed out that it was "an egoistic ideology contrived by Christians, completely ignoring historical facts from ancient times," and that "Nitobe's Bushido is spreading a false image of Japan abroad and confusing what the concepts ought to be."

> * A researcher of the Kiki (the Kojiki and Nihon Shoki). He argued that from the myths of the Kiki down to Emperor Jinmu, the "eight reigns without historical records" up to the 14th Emperor Chuai and his consort Empress Jingu—meaning all emperors prior to the 15th Emperor Ojin, including their genealogies—were not historical facts, but stories created in later generations.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/grqhwv3tow54h40qvt5qs/pexels-jithinmurali-8587562.jpg?rlkey=lsdmozjvtta7dy4g1yugz49vd&st=v95flr6m&dl=0

※※※ Criticism of Inazo Mineichiro's "Bushido" (1899)

> 《Google SI Overview》
>The main criticisms directed at Inazo Nitobe's book Bushido (1899) are: (1) that it is "a fiction far removed from historical reality (an idealized concept)," and (2) that "it possesses aspects that make it easily exploitable for nationalism and militarism."

> Key Points of Criticism

> * Divergence from Reality (The Fiction Theory): Pointed out that in actual history, what samurai in most eras emphasized was "surviving actual combat," and that the sophisticated, noble spiritual and cultural aspects depicted by Nitobe only became widespread from the Edo period onward, and even then, only among a limited stratum and period.

> * Ex-post-facto Idealistic Reconstruction: It was reinterpreted and constructed by Nitobe in an ex-post-facto and idealistic manner to counter and rival Western Christian morals and chivalry, leading to criticisms since its publication that it "over-romanticized reality."

> * Objections to Root Interpretations: While Nitobe traced the roots of Bushido to Buddhism, Shinto, and Confucianism, experts have also presented detailed verifications and objections regarding the historical and ideological interpretations of the relationships and degrees of influence among these.

> * Tie-in to Nationalism and Ideology: Partly because the book was received amid the heightened nationalist and ultranationalist zeitgeist following the First Sino-Japanese War, critical views argue that such an emphasis on spiritualism and morality linked up with later militarism and the state ideology of "self-sacrifice for the state," or laid the groundwork for it.

> * Eurocentric Perspective: Written as an apologia and defense in response to overseas (especially Western) intellectuals asking, "Do people in Japan have morals without religious education?", some view it from the starting point as "self-justification and self-assertion tailored to Western standards," distorting Japan's unique and complex historical reality.
>



〓 The essence of the Japanese samurai—originating from the Kanto samurai bands that established the Kamakura shogunate—is that of armed manor lords and bourgeois revolutionaries.

"Mineichiro Adachi, an Emishi of Tohoku, who pushed off the cleanup of the Manchurian Incident—unilaterally forced through by Seishiro Itagaki, Kanji Ishiwara, and other Emishi of Tohoku—onto the Japanese government established by the Yamato people through the Meiji Restoration and the Boshin War."



[You]
Was the main force of the Kanto Army at the time of the Manchurian Incident composed of troops transferred from Sendai?

> 《Google SI Overview》
>Exactly. At the time the Manchurian Incident broke out in September 1931 (Showa 6), the actual main combat force of the local Kanto Army that carried out military operations was the "Imperial Japanese Army 2nd Division," whose base (division headquarters) was located in Sendai.

> The key points of the situation at the time are as follows:

> * Rotational Garrisoning in Manchuria:

>The Kanto Army of that day was not a permanent, independent massive army; instead, "divisions" from mainland Japan were dispatched (transferred) to Manchuria (current northeastern China) on a rotation of several years to take charge of defense.

> * Stationing of the 2nd Division (Sendai):

>In 1931, when the incident occurred, it happened that the 2nd Division from Sendai was under the command of the Kanto Army and on guard along the South Manchuria Railway (Mantetsu) line and other areas.

> * The Liutiaogou Incident and Mobilization:

>When the Liutiaogou Incident, which triggered the conflict, occurred, the various regiments of the 2nd Division stationed in Changchun, Fengtian (current Shenyang), etc. (such as the 4th and 29th Infantry Regiments), immediately mobilized under the plans and orders of Kanto Army staff officers (such as Lieutenant Colonel Kanji Ishiwara), swiftly moving to occupy the whole of Manchuria.

> * Conclusion:

>Therefore, the perception that "the main force of the Kanto Army at the time of the Manchurian Incident was units transferred from Sendai" is historically accurate.
>

[You] What was the content of the letter sent by Mineichiro Adachi (from Yamagata Prefecture, graduate of the mediocre University of Tokyo Faculty of Law), President of the Permanent Court of International Justice, to the Prime Minister regarding the Manchurian Incident?

> 《Google SI Overview》
>In the letter sent by Mineichiro Adachi, President of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), to the Prime Minister of Japan (addressed to then-Prime Minister Reijiro Wakatsuki / or Makoto Saito, etc.) in response to the Manchurian Incident (1931), while acknowledging the necessity of maintaining Japan's rights and interests in Manchuria, he feared that if the incident were brought to the arena of international justice, Japan would find itself at an extreme disadvantage, and strongly urged a settlement through political and diplomatic negotiations rather than a legal courtroom struggle. [1]

> Main Content and Background of the Letter

> * Appeal to Avoid Legal Settlement: He pointed out that if the dispute concerning the Manchurian Incident were submitted to a judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice, judging from the trends of the international community at the time, it was "obvious that it would merely provoke the laughter of everyone in vain," turning out to be decisively disadvantageous for Japan. [1]

> * Political and Diplomatic Resolution: Rather than entrusting the matter to legal adjudication through a court, he urged the government to grasp it "broadly and largely as a political problem" and settle the situation through diplomatic and political means. [1]

> * Caught Between National Interest and International Cooperation: Primary historical materials and collections of letters reveal that while holding the stance as a diplomat and international jurist that Japan's Manchurian rights and interests ought to be protected, he harbored deep anguish and apprehension between the legal order of the international community and the military runaway actions of his motherland. [1, 2, 3]

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/xn1nb05n9tddrzb6f2q8r/pexels-andromeda99-11507166.jpg?rlkey=bga7e105n1zqlcaebcg3eyugm&st=3u0334kj&dl=0

[You]
What was Mineichiro Adachi's career at the Permanent Court of International Justice?

>《Google SI Overview》
>Mineichiro Adachi of Japan was elected as the President of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) in 1931, becoming the first Asian to hold the position.

> What was the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ)?

> * Overview:

>An international judicial organ established within the League of Nations, and the predecessor to the modern International Court of Justice (ICJ).

> * Period of Operation:

>Existed from 1922 to 1946.

> About Mineichiro Adachi

> * Background:

>Active as a diplomat and international jurist, serving as a judge on the Permanent Court of International Justice.

> * Assumption of Presidency:

>Elected in 1931 with the highest score to a second term as judge, and elected President that same year in 1931 (term: 1931–1934).

> * Other:

>Stepped down as court president in 1932, the year following the outbreak of the Manchurian Incident, and passed away in 1934.
>



〓 Mineichiro Adachi was from Yamagata Prefecture and a graduate of the mediocre University of Tokyo Faculty of Law.

〓 Mineichiro Adachi, who was President of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), sent a letter to the Prime Minister of Japan (addressed to then-Prime Minister Makoto Saito and others) in response to the Manchurian Incident (1931).

〓 In that letter, while acknowledging the necessity of maintaining 'Japan's' rights and interests in Manchuria, Mineichiro Adachi feared that if the incident were brought to the arena of international justice, 'Japan' would be placed at an extreme disadvantage, and strongly urged a settlement through political and diplomatic negotiations rather than a legal courtroom struggle.

〓 The Kellogg-Briand Pact (Treaty for the Renunciation of War, entering into force in 1929), which stipulated that contracting parties renounce war as an instrument of national policy in international disputes and settle them peacefully.

〓 According to international law (= the Kellogg-Briand Pact), the Liutiaogou Incident (September 18, 1931, Friday) should have been resolved peacefully between the Japanese government and the Government of the Republic of China.

〓 At the same time, the Japanese government needed to severely punish the core leaders of the Kanto Army—principally the Emishi of Tohoku such as Seishiro Itagaki and Kanji Ishiwara—who had ignored international law (= the Kellogg-Briand Pact) and plunged recklessly into unilateral military action.

〓 Yet, Mineichiro Adachi—President of the Permanent Court of International Justice and an Emishi of Tohoku who was a graduate of the mediocre University of Tokyo Faculty of Law—far from advising the punishment of the leaders of the Kanto Army mainly composed of Tohoku Emishi who had plunged unilaterally into military action ignoring international law, instead:

(1) asserted that the preservation of 'Japan's' rights and interests in Manchuria was necessary,

(2) warned that if the incident were brought to the arena of international justice, 'Japan' would be put at an extreme disadvantage,

and advised that a settlement be reached via political and diplomatic negotiations between the Japanese and Chinese governments before it could be taken to a courtroom battle at the Permanent Court of International Justice.

〓 In short, he shifted the responsibility for the violations of international law unilaterally triggered by the Tohoku Emishi onto the Japanese government (established by the Yamato people through the Meiji Restoration and the Boshin War) and perfected the art of playing dead.

〓 That was an utterly unqualified and unbefitting act for the President of the Permanent Court of International Justice, vividly reflecting the behavior of a traitor to the country by a graduate of the mediocre University of Tokyo Faculty of Law.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jf871e4igenhr7sb6epnb/pexels-hannah-arana-2154018305-35039351.jpg?rlkey=yi6lnzaehscaln594ci113as8&st=g4slerk4&dl=0

> * Honorary Member of the American Society of International Law (1931)

> * Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1932)

> * Member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (1933)

> * Grand Cordon of the Order of the Rising Sun with Paulownia Flowers (1934)

> * State Funeral in the Netherlands and Permanent Court of International Justice Funeral (1934)
>


〓 Yet, not only the Japanese government (established by the Yamato people), blinded by the credentials of a "mediocre graduate of the University of Tokyo Faculty of Law" or "President of the Permanent Court of International Justice," but also leaders of Western powers including America and the Netherlands, vied with one another to shower excessive praise on Mineichiro Adachi, who was nothing more than a piece of trash Emishi of Tohoku.

〓 Looking back over 1,200 years of Japanese history since the San-ichi-gon-jitsu-soron (817–821 AD), those Tohoku Emishi bastards rely on the following standard tactics:

(1) Procuring the title of a mediocre University of Tokyo Faculty of Law graduate—which is in reality "garbage/trash"—alongside grabbing the commander's seat of the South Manchuria Railway garrison (= the Kanto Army), the presidency of the Permanent Court of International Justice, and the under-secretary-generalship of the League of Nations, thereby mass-hypnotizing the credentials-obsessed Yamato people and Western powers to subvert them first;

(2) Exploding into reckless actions whenever the mood strikes them—even without any prospect of victory whatsoever—as seen in the Zenkunen War (1050–1062 AD), Gosannen War (1083–1087 AD), the Boshin War (1868–1869 AD), and the Pearl Harbor surprise attack (1941);

(3) Launching surprise attacks before the enemy side can complete its war preparations, as seen in the Ichinotani Hiyodorigoe (March 1184 AD), the Liutiaogou Incident, and the Pearl Harbor surprise attack.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/h3msp8qgwh5idilupksgr/dimitrisvetsikas1969-greece-2734836_640.jpg?rlkey=g4bwngeuonpg9xg72bxijugtv&st=ytv98cqd&dl=0

> 《Google SI Overview》
>The retrofit construction work for mounting Tomahawk cruise missiles, carried out at the U.S. Navy Base in San Diego, California, targeted the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Aegis destroyer Chokai, with the refit completed in March 2026.

> With this, it acquired the Tomahawk launching capability (counterattack capability) for the first time as a Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force vessel.

> The overview of the renovation work and operations is as follows:

> ⚓️ Refit History and Timeline

> • October 2025: Dispatched to San Diego Naval Base to coincide with regular maintenance timing. With U.S. Navy support, internal system retrofit construction and crew operational training began.

> • Thursday, March 26, 2026: A ceremony commemorating the completion of the refit was held in San Diego, officially declaring the acquisition of Tomahawk launching capability.

> • Summer 2026 (until August): The first live-fire Tomahawk test launch using live ammunition was conducted in the Pacific Ocean off San Diego and achieved a successful outcome.

> • September 2026: Having finished all training and live-fire tests, the Chokai is scheduled to return to Japan and assume active duties (home port: Sasebo).

> 🚀 Scope of Renovation and Future Plans

> This refit involved integrating an advanced fire control system (missile fire control system) and adding hardware and software to the vessel.

> The Japanese government is proceeding with plans to acquire up to 400 Tomahawks from the U.S. by fiscal year 2027.

> The Ministry of Defense has a policy of carrying out similar retrofits sequentially across all 8 of its Aegis ships (Kongou, Atago, and Maya classes), starting with the Chokai.
>



〓 The current Japan Self-Defense Forces(JSDF), dominated by hardened militarists and lawless elements of the Tohoku Emishi who could explode into action at any moment—such as Toshio Tamogami (former Air Chief of Staff) and Kenichiro Nagumo (first Joint Operations Commander).

〓 Is it really safe to generously sell 400 Tomahawks to such JSDF?

〓 In light of 1,200 years of Japanese history since the San-ichi-gon-jitsu-shoron (817–821 AD), one can easily imagine a future scenario where the Tohoku Emishi explode in a rage and fire Tomahawks at U.S. military bases such as Misawa, Yokosuka, Iwakuni, Sasebo, or Kadena.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/4mj9m7oo8qo7ahp290tut/pexels-jakeheinemann-14971556.jpg?rlkey=4q8g95rio23iuyax4p8av17on&st=2imumna8&dl=0

〓 Meanwhile, let me issue a warning to those Tohoku Emishi scum:

(1) You got puffed up with the delusion that tricking the Yamato people and Western powers is a piece of cake after seeing Inazo Nitobe—an Emishi of Tohoku—become Under-Secretary-General of the League of Nations and adorn the 5,000-yen note post-war, and seeing Mineichiro Adachi, a mediocre University of Tokyo law grad and trash president of the Permanent Court of International Justice, praised across the board by the Japanese government (run by the Yamato people) as well as Western powers like America and the Netherlands, even receiving a state funeral. Consequently, your ambitions erupted to join hands with the madman Hitler, overthrow the bourgeois revolutionary governments of Japan, America, and France at once, and establish a militarist (fascist) regime dominated by the Tohoku Emishi over Japan and Asia.

(2) However, while the fickle bourgeois revolutionary governments of the Yamato people and Western powers are easily deceived by "credentials" and the like, once they realize they have been duped by the Tohoku Emishi and the madman Hitler, they unite as one to launch a ferocious counterattack—meaning that the Tohoku Emishi and Hitler's Nazi party will be crushed as easily as twisting a baby's arm.

〓 Remember that well!

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/vd0nzxvjz7t9g3wn2pdl1/pexels-andromeda99-11507172.jpg?rlkey=aosu2v9u0ar96cv5wm238yqit&st=fc9tvqxm&dl=0